Statistics
13,527 total views | Who I Am...Latest BlogsNo articles found
Wall - 0 followersLatest NewsNo articles found
| VideosYou can link to any video on RunnerSpace and put it in your video box on your profile! |
watchout, on , said:
By the way, just pulled this up: Utah 5A Projected scores (including only teams that will make it to state, and teams that I have been keeping track of) ... does not include results from regional meets that have already taken place. Obviously, when the rest of the teams are included in the field, scores for teams with weaker #3/4/5 runners are going to go up by more than those teams that are strong at those spots, but for a general starting point this shows that the race for second is very tight, and the race for fourth is going to be just as tight (and those groups aren't separated by enough to think Westlake couldn't finish second, for example.. Alta is a bit more of a stretch, but still in the running if they put it together on the same day at state while others don't).
44 American Fork UT
88 Lone Peak UT
90 Bingham UT
105 Riverton UT
113 Davis UT
122 Westlake UT
151 Alta UT
214 Hillcrest UT
I'm going to go out on a limb and predict that Alta will finish higher than 7th. These rankings and predictions are definitely motivational though.
watchout, on , said:
By the way, just pulled this up: Utah 5A Projected scores (including only teams that will make it to state, and teams that I have been keeping track of) ... does not include results from regional meets that have already taken place. Obviously, when the rest of the teams are included in the field, scores for teams with weaker #3/4/5 runners are going to go up by more than those teams that are strong at those spots, but for a general starting point this shows that the race for second is very tight, and the race for fourth is going to be just as tight (and those groups aren't separated by enough to think Westlake couldn't finish second, for example.. Alta is a bit more of a stretch, but still in the running if they put it together on the same day at state while others don't).
44 American Fork UT
88 Lone Peak UT
90 Bingham UT
105 Riverton UT
113 Davis UT
122 Westlake UT
151 Alta UT
214 Hillcrest UT
Hillcrest is 4A.
By the way, just pulled this up: Utah 5A Projected scores (including only teams that will make it to state, and teams that I have been keeping track of) ... does not include results from regional meets that have already taken place. Obviously, when the rest of the teams are included in the field, scores for teams with weaker #3/4/5 runners are going to go up by more than those teams that are strong at those spots, but for a general starting point this shows that the race for second is very tight, and the race for fourth is going to be just as tight (and those groups aren't separated by enough to think Westlake couldn't finish second, for example.. Alta is a bit more of a stretch, but still in the running if they put it together on the same day at state while others don't).
44 American Fork UT
88 Lone Peak UT
90 Bingham UT
105 Riverton UT
113 Davis UT
122 Westlake UT
151 Alta UT
214 Hillcrest UT
watchout, on , said:
Don't be surprised if Bingham is ahead of Lone Peak in the next regional update, however - they've been gaining ground, and eventually Bingham's consistency will overtake Lone Peak's inconsistent tendencies, and that's especially likely at the state meet and beyond (when consistency begins to REALLY matter).
The State Meet should settle the debate. Thanks for doing the rankings. Kids like seeing them, and I think it's a motivator for the teams that are in there, and for the teams that think they should be in there. Benefits to everyone involved.
Don't be surprised if Bingham is ahead of Lone Peak in the next regional update, however - they've been gaining ground, and eventually Bingham's consistency will overtake Lone Peak's inconsistent tendencies, and that's especially likely at the state meet and beyond (when consistency begins to REALLY matter).